Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 33.5% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock