Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 10.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 141.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate