+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 5.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 2 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:32.9%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:38.4%(+5.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:32.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:38.4%(+5.5%)
Providers:0