+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:36.1%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:40.5%(+4.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:36.1%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:40.5%(+4.5%)
Providers:0