+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-5 Codex
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 68.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Codex is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.5% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (74.5%). Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
GPT-5 Codex
OpenAI
2025-09-15
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:75.7%(+68.3%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 Codex
Average Score:7.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 Codex
2024-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:75.7%(+68.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 Codex
Avg Score:7.4%
Providers:0