+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:47.3%(+15.9%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:31.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:47.3%(+15.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:31.4%
Providers:0