Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 3.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together