+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 27.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00($57.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:61.8%(+27.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:61.8%(+27.4%)
Providers:2