+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.1% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), BIG-Bench Hard (93.1%), HumanEval (92.0%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.0% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.8%), HumanEval (83.5%), MBPP (82.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-06-21
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:39.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:58.9%(+19.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:39.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:58.9%(+19.1%)
Providers:0