Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 23.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval