Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 35.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 168.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $72.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval