+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Codestral-22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 37.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:55.7%(+37.3%)
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:18.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:55.7%(+37.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:18.4%
Providers:0