Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 41.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $16.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Command R+
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Command R+
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Command R+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Command R+
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere