Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 11.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 383.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $17.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.1% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.1%), MT-Bench (90.2%), HumanEval (89.0%). The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V2.5
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V2.5
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic