+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 22.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 656.8K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $17.63 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($17.63 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:49.8%(+22.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:27.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:49.8%(+22.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:27.4%
Providers:1