Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval