+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E2B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 26.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 11 benchmarks. Notable strengths include PIQA (78.9%), BoolQ (76.4%), ARC-E (75.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:49.8%(+26.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:23.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:49.8%(+26.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:23.0%
Providers:0