Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 336.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $42.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together