Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 19.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
27 days newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra