Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 33.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI