Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 1.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
o1
Azure
OpenAI