+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.0% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.8%), HumanEval (83.5%), MBPP (82.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:48.0%(+9.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:38.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:48.0%(+9.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:38.6%
Providers:0