Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 10.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 64.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval