Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 3.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 320 more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $16.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (93.4%), MMLU-Redux (91.8%), MMLU-Pro (83.7%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V3.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V3.1
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita