Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 69.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate