+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:34.0%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:36.8%(+2.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:34.0%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:36.8%(+2.8%)
Providers:0