Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 21.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 287.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 9 benchmarks. Notable strengths include BIG-Bench (75.0%), MMLU (71.8%), WMT23 (71.7%). The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro