+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 2.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 728.8K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $17.63 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
19 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($17.63 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:37.1%(+2.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:34.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:37.1%(+2.2%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:34.8%
Providers:1