+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 3.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($15.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:40.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:43.7%(+3.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:40.8%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:43.7%(+3.0%)
Providers:2