+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($17.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:40.8%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:26.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:40.8%(+14.2%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:26.5%
Providers:1