Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. GLM-4.5 is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.5
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.5
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GLM-4.5
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval