Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 28.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 307.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI