Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 21.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 195.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $22.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.1% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MGSM (88.5%), HumanEval (87.1%), MMLU (86.5%). It supports a 132K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4 Turbo
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI