+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 27.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 752.3K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. GPT-4.1 is $8.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.2%), CharXiv-D (87.9%), IFEval (87.4%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00($8.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:25.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:53.2%(+27.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:25.5%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:53.2%(+27.7%)
Providers:1