Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 24.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $17.46 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT OSS 120B
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval