+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 5.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:37.1%(+5.9%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:31.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:37.1%(+5.9%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:31.1%
Providers:0