Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 64.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-4
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-4
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval