+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 3.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.2% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in C-Eval (92.5%), GSM8k (92.1%), MMLU-redux-2.0 (90.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:35.4%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:39.1%(+3.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:35.4%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:39.1%(+3.7%)
Providers:0