+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Mistral Small
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 262.5K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small. Mistral Small is $17.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small is a language model developed by Mistral AI. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Mistral Small
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.60($17.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:74.1%(+74.1%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Average Score:0.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:74.1%(+74.1%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1