Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 168.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3 Haiku is $88.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval