Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 656.8K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Haiku. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $1.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Natural2Code (92.9%), MATH (89.7%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash