Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 16.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku is $9.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval