+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:42.0%(+0.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:42.0%(+0.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:0