Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku leads with 31.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 379.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
11 months newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Claude 3 Haiku
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI