Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 27.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together