Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 7.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.9%), HumanEval+ (92.3%), IFEval (84.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Claude 3 Haiku
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
Bedrock
Claude 3 Haiku
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Claude 3 Haiku
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus