+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Claude Opus 4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 47.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 168.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude 3 Haiku is $88.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25($88.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+47.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+47.6%)
Providers:4