+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Codestral-22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Codestral-22B leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3 Haiku is available on 3 providers. Overall, Codestral-22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral 22B was developed as a specialized coding model from Mistral AI, designed to excel at code generation, completion, and understanding tasks. Built with 22 billion parameters optimized for programming, it serves developers requiring advanced assistance with software development across multiple programming languages.
2 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:75.9%
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:81.1%(+5.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:75.9%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:81.1%(+5.2%)
Providers:0