+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs Command R+
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3 Haiku leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Both models have similar pricing. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ was developed by Cohere as an advanced language model designed for enterprise applications requiring retrieval-augmented generation. Built to excel at combining external knowledge with language understanding, it serves businesses needing reliable, factually-grounded AI assistance with strong reasoning and multilingual capabilities.
5 months newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($0.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:84.8%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:76.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:84.8%(+8.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:76.5%
Providers:2