+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 47.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3 Haiku offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. Claude 3 Haiku is $1.15 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku was created as the fastest and most affordable model in its intelligence class, processing 21K tokens per second for prompts under 32K tokens. Built for enterprise workloads requiring quick analysis of large datasets, it combines state-of-the-art vision capabilities with strong performance on industry benchmarks while prioritizing speed, affordability, and enterprise-grade security.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
1 year newer
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic
2024-03-13
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25($1.15 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input:$0.50
Output:$2.15
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Average Score:33.3%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Average Score:81.0%(+47.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3 Haiku
Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Avg Score:81.0%(+47.7%)
Providers:3